Talk Back
Login to view our forums
Tools
Send us a note!
Login
Sign Up!
Send an E-Card!
Print This
Customize Site
Our Newsletter

View Newsletter Archive
Poll
No active polls.
View poll results
AHRC

An Article
JUDGE VIOLATES MANDATORY DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

Judge David Yaffe has not been reporting income he receives from Los Angeles County on Form 700

December 18, 2008

By AHRC News Services

Sacramento, California -

Homeowners and their lawyers have been reporting to AHRC for years that California State Court judges are:

• constantly ignoring laws and evidence favoring their cases
• writing "Unpublished" opinions against them that defy the facts, laws and logic
• depriving them of justice
• saddling them with fraudulent or void judgments and stripping them of their assets, jobs, freedom and property
• stripping homeowners the right to the courts by falsely declaring them "vexatious litigants" for simply defending themselves against frivolous lawsuits by rogue lawyers
• stripping homeowner advocate lawyers of their license to earn a living as a lawyer if they vigorously represent homeowners

Richard Fine, a former Federal prosecutor has also had to confront such judicial tactics at the Los Angeles Superior Court. Richard uses his legal and investigative skills to fight back. He also continues to share his work with the public on AHRC.

Following is Richard's Complaint to the Enforcement Division of the California Fair Political Practices Commission on Judge David Yaffe dated December 18, 2008

PERSON WHO ALLEGEDLY VIOLATED THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT

David Yaffe
111 North Hill Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213)974-5881

PROVISION OR PROVISIONS OF THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT ALLEGEDLY VIOLATED:

Judge David Yaffe, is a Los Angeles Superior Court judge and a state elected official under Article Vl § 16 of the California Constitution.

Under Article Vl § 17 of the California Constitution and the Code of Judicial Ethics, judges cannot have other employment (other than teaching).

Under the Political Reform Act. Govt. Code § 87200 and § 82030(b)(2) as interpreted by Regulations of the FPC, the judges must report all income on the Form 700 except salary from a federal or local government to whom the judge provides services. The Los Angeles Superior Court judges are State employees and do not provide services to Los Angeles County.

Since approximately 1988, Los Angeles County has paid "local judicial benefits" to Los Angeles Superior Court judges in the form of "Mega Flex" benefits which can be taken in cash, a "professional development allowance" in cash and cash contributions to the judge's 401(K) retirement account. In 2007, these payments amounted to approximately $46,338.00 per judge or 21 million for the judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court.

Judge Yaffe's Form 700 filing show that Judge Yafe has not reported such Los Angeles County payments. The Los Angeles County Registrars's office in a phone conversation informed me that no Los Angeles Superior Court has reported such payments on their Form 700.

On October 10, 2008, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate Distict.Div. One, held that the payments from Los Angels County to the Los Angeles Superior Court judges violated Article Vi § 19 of the California Constitution in the case of Harold P. Sturgeon v County of Los Angeles (Certified for Publication) Case No. D050832, LASC No. BC 351286

DESCRIPTION OF FACTS CONSTITUTING ALLEGED VIOLATION AND HOW YOU HAVE PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE THAT IT OCCURRED

Failure to report payments from Los Angeles County on Form 700 Statement of Economic Interest for any year. Form 700s do not show such income. Neither Judge Yafe nor any other Los Angeles Superior Court judge perform services for Los Angeles County as they are State Elected Constitutional officers and employees of the State of California.

Their compensation is set by the State Legislature pursuant o Article Vi § 19 of theCourt judges has been held to be unconstitutional and to violate Article Vl § 19 in the case of Harold P. Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles (Certified for Publication), 10/10/08 California Court os Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Div. One Case No. D050832, LASC No. BC 351286.

Form 700s at Los Angeles County Registrars/Clerk's Office do not show Los Angeles County payments.

NAME AND ADDRESS OF POTENTIAL WITNESSES

Los Angeles County Registrar
12400 Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650

Telephone: (800)815-2666

 
View Comments (0) | Post a comment
 
For more information, please check out the articles listed below:
  • Attorney Richard I. Fine Informs the Public of the time and place of the Oral Argument Open to the Public in the State Bar Case - Richard I. Fine
  • Attorney Richard I. Fine vs. The California State Bar - Dr.Shirley Moore
  • Questions involving violations of the U.S. Constitution and the Federal Mail and Wire Fraud Law - Richard I. Fine
  • Attorney Richard Fine's Motion to Immediately Remove Designation of "Not Eligible to Practice Law" from State Bar Website - Richard I. Fine
  • Motion to Disqualify Judges Remke, Epstein and Temporary Judge Stovitz by Attorney Richrad Fine, a member of the California State Bar - Richard I. Fine
  • Attorney Richard Fine's Motion To Dismiss Prosecution by the California State Bar Court - Richard I. Fine
  • CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS SHOWN BY COURT RECORDS DEMONSTRATES LA JUDGES TARGETED RICHARD I. FINE FOR UPHOLDING CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION AND SEEKING TO ENFORCE U.S. CONSTITUTION - AHRC News Services
  • Richard Fine Files Notice of Disqualification of California State Bar Judges Honn, McElroy, Armendariz and Miles for Bias and Acting on Case Upon Their Own Disqualification - Richard I. Fine
  • Attorney Richard Fine Challenges State Bar Action as a Gross Violation of First Amendment Rights of Freedom of Speech and to Petition the Government to Redress Grievances - Richard I. Fine
  • CRUSADING ATTORNEY RICHARD I. FINE VINDICATED IN HIS BATTLE WITH CALIFORNIA STATE BAR - Richard I. Fine
  • C.A. Holds Local Judges' Extra Benefits Unconstitutional - Kenneth Ofgang
  • Court shoots down judicial perks - Troy Anderson
  • Are Local Judges Serving Two Masters? - NBC Los Angeles
  • RICHARD I. FINE FILES COMPLAINT WITH FBI TO INVESTIGATE RETALIATION AGAINST HIM FOR EXPOSING AND PROSECUTING UNCONSTITUTIONAL PAYMENTS BY LA COUNTY TO LA COUNTY JUDGES - Richard I. Fine
  • FBI ASKED TO INVESTIGATE LOS ANGELES JUDGES - Rod Clifford
  • Former U. S Prosecutor, While Battling Illegal County Payments to Los Angeles County Judges, Falls Victim To Identity Theft and Mail Fraud - AHRC News Services
  • New ruling on judges' pay sought - Troy Anderson
  • Events Relating to Los Angeles Superior Court Judges Retaliating Against Richard I. Fine - Richard I. Fine
  • Richard I. Fine
  • Submitted Files
    Filename Description File Type File Size Click to download
    JudgeDavidYaffe.pdf Complaint to the Enforcement Division of the California Fair Political Practices Commission against Los Angeles Judge David Yaffe - December 18, 2008 PDF document, version 1.1 67KB Download
    Search AHRC
    Login required
    x
    Related Articles

    Boss Thy Neighbor - CHRISTOPHER CONTE

    Mrs. Swindle loses House over $205 Delinquent Assessments - AHRC News Services

    Orange County Pair Might lose home for $120 in Missing Dues - Ronald Campbell

    The American Home- A Thing of the Past - AHRC News Services

    CALIFORNIA WRESTLING WITH CHANGES IN HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION LAWS - AHRC News Services

    Board OKs two budgets; surplus due - Laura Vozzella

    Problems With a Globe-Trotting Father - ALAN C. MILLER, JUDY PASTERNAK,

    Violence begets violence - AHRC News Services

    Homeowners, beware the associations - Alisa Ross

    HOMEOWNER ALLIANCE LAUNCHES NATIONWIDE PROTEST AGAINST CHUBB INSURANCE - AHRC News Services


    American Homeowners Resource Center (AHRC)
    PO Box 97 • San Juan Capistrano • California • 92693
    Email:

    © 1990-2009 • AHRC News Services

    Disclaimer: AHRC is an interactive information WEBSITE. The information contained here is that of the users. It is not the opinion of AHRC. AHRC does not WARRANT the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of any information and shall not be liable for any losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy, reliability, or timeliness of such information.

    Powered by AHRCwebsites