|
|
|
|
|
|
An Article
|
|
LA County Payments to LA Superior Court Judges Cost Taxpayers Almost 1 Billion Dollars and Denied Constitutional Rights to the People of LA County
January 07, 2009
By
Richard I. Fine
(View author info)
|
|
|
|
| |
I've been reading lots of stuff online about Richard Fine lately. He's gotten quite a (good) reputation for himself !! :-)
Jan in Colorado
Posted Jan 27 2009 6:01PM CET
|
| |
|
| |
Username withheld
, California |
| |
|
|
| |
"The State Bar Review Department Judges Epstein, Remke and Stovitz were all defendants in the federal case of Fine v. State Bar of California et al., USDC Case No. CV 08-2906 in which they were co defendants with the State Bar, the Board of Governors, the Chief Trial Counsel [Prosecutor] and jointly represented by the General Counsel of the State Bar in a case seeking to declare unconstitutional the "Moral Turpitude" statute as applied and the "involuntary enrollment statute as violating the First and Fourteenth Amendments. "
Good ploy.
New Mexico federal chief judge Martha Vazquez, who is now threatening Payne
http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/vazquez/vazquez#strange266,
and Wyoming chief judge William F Downes are both defendants in two New Mexico paid for 12-person trial by jury lawsuits.
Both were fraudulently removed to federal court without required affidavit of jurisdiction.
Harrassment and Defamation are not federal questions.
Any judgment rendered by a court which lacks jurisdiction, either of the subject matter of the parties, or lacks inherent power to enter the particular judgment, or entered an Order which violated due process or was procured through extrinsic or collateral fraud, is null and void, and can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that the party is properly before the court.
Therefore, all ruling in these two federal lawsuits are void.
Vazquez' December 11, 2008 threatening ORDER is, of course, void.
The limitations inherent in the requirements of due process of law extend to judicial, as well as political, branches of the government, so that a judgment may not be rendered in violation of those constitutional limitations and guaranties.
But we would be foolish to contest this in HER COURT.
So we are filing fraud loss claims with NCUA for the tune of $22,036 which was taked from out retirment-protected Sandia Laboaratory Federal Credit Union saving account by SLFCU CEO Christopher Jillson using a bogus court order.
Court order did not carry required FILED stamp of clerk.
Let's see what happens at NCUA.
http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/ncuaoig/ncuaoig.htm#donahue2
If NCUA does not pay-up, the this may indicate insurance fraud.
This is handled at the state level.
Posted Jan 8 2009 10:34PM CET
|
| |
|
| |
bill payne
(View Profile)
abq, New Mexico |
| |
|
|
| |
Richard, thank whatever powers-that-be for folks like you and Elizabeth! Where would any of us HOA homeowners be without you both!
My guess is that we all would be huddled with our families in our besiegned HOA homes, scared to death to open our doors or our mouths lest our boards of directors and their CAI attorneys take our homes and everything we own away from us! But thanks to both of you, many HOA homeowners (including me) are now not only confronting our less than stellar boards, but we are kicking them in the rearend (figuratively, of course, not literally) for good measure. :-)
Keep on keeping on, you guys. HOA evildoers WILL eventually crumble and disappear in the light of logic, and reason, and PUBLICITY !! }:>
Posted Jan 8 2009 8:15AM CET
|
| |
|
| |
Jan Jackson
Florissant, Colorado |
| |
|
|
Return to 'LA County Payments to LA Superior Court Judges Cost Taxpayers Almost 1 Billion Dollars and Denied Constitutional Rights to the People of LA County' |
Submit a comment
|
|
|
|
